The Gospel According to Thomas — Saying #3

Jesus said,

“If your leaders tell you, ‘Look! — the Kingdom is in the sky.’ then the birds in the sky will arrive there before you do. If they should tell you, ‘It is in the sea!’ then the fish will arrive there first. Rather, the Kingdom is within you — and it is within you sight. When you know yourselves, then you will also be known, and you will discover that you are the children of the Living Father. If however, you will not know yourselves, then you exist in poverty, and you yourselves have become poverty.”

Home is really not so far away.

As we have just heard, not only is the Kingdom — which was our original Home, and still is — to be sought, but it can also be found.

The Kingdom is a reality that exists and persists within each person, an imminent Presence that surrounds us all. This original Home exists both within the appearances of our present selves and also persists beyond these appearances. The Kingdom therefore can be discovered everywhere. It is ubiquitous.

Thomas parodies the prevailing attitudes that expect the Kingdom to be simply somewhere else, remarking that if the Kingdom were merely up in heaven the birds would arrive before us! Or if it were only somewhere across the sea, the fish would arrive there first — rather, Thomas declares, the Kingdom’s focal point is both within and without. Modern physics sometimes uses the term, “non-local” to describe the basis of reality (der Ungrund)  that exists outside the appearances of space-time but yet deep within each atom of space-time. Thomas seems to be pointing to this same “non-local” domain — both beyond space-time and yet resident with it — even if Thomas does not utilize the terminology of physics in order to say it.

As we’ve previously discussed, the key to Thomas is the concept of self-knowledge: “When you know yourselves, then you will also be known.” The picture seems to emerge of someone looking into a mirror — only to discover that the image in the mirror is not only self-aware, but is also staring back! Because the Kingdom is everywhere and because all are of the same essence (As Pascal said, “All history is one Immortal Man, who is continuously learning.”) when we “know ourselves,” we realize that we are also known — in the very act of knowing.

Everything we see, everyone we meet, everywhere we go — that is the place of the Kingdom. With knowledge of this and attention to that knowledge, we too can perceive the Kingdom. Without this knowledge (gnosis) and attention to it, we get lost in a world of empty appearances and illusion, a condition Thomas refers to as “poverty.”

Home is really not so far away.

Posted in Gnosis, The Gospel According to Thomas | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Zen and the art of protecting the planet

“In a rare interview,” writes Jo Confino in The Guardian, “Zen Buddhist master Thich Nhat Hahn warns of the threat to civilisation from climate change and the spiritual revival that is needed to avert catastrophe.”

Here are some quotes from this fascinating article that are pertinent to the focus of Passersby.

Tranquilizing Ourselves With Over-consumption

“The situation the Earth is in today has been created by unmindful production and unmindful consumption. We consume to forget our worries and our anxieties. Tranquilising ourselves with over-consumption is not the way.”

“The spiritual crisis of the West is the cause for the many sufferings we encounter. Because of our dualistic thinking that god and the kingdom of god is outside of us and in the future – we don’t know that god’s true nature is in every one of us. So we need to put god back into the right place, within ourselves. It is like when the wave knows that water is not outside of her.

“Everything we touch in our daily lives, including our body, is a miracle. By putting the kingdom of god in the right place, it shows us it is possible to live happily right here, right now. If we wake up to this, we do not have to run after the things we believe are crucial to our happiness like fame, power and sex. If we stop creating despair and anger, we make the atmosphere healthy again.

“Maybe we have enough technology to save the planet but it is not enough because the people are not ready. This is why we need to focus on the other side of the problem, the pollution of the environment not in terms of carbon dioxide but the toxic atmosphere in which we live; so many people getting sick, many children facing violence and despair and committing suicide.

Spiritual Pollution

“We should speak more of spiritual pollution. When we sit together and listen to the sound of the [meditation] bell at this retreat, we calm our body and mind. We produce a very powerful and peaceful energy that can penetrate in every one of us. So, conversely, the same thing is true with the collective energy of fear, anger and despair. We create an atmosphere and environment that is destructive to all of us. We don’t think enough about that, we only think about the physical environment.

“Our way of life, our style of living, is the cause of it. We are looking for happiness and running after it in such a way that creates anger, fear and discrimination. So when you attend a retreat you have a chance to look at the deep roots of this pollution of the collective energy that is unwholesome.

“How can we change the atmosphere to get the energy of healing and transformation for us and our children? When the children come to the retreat, they can relax because the adults are relaxed. Here together we create a good environment and that is a collective energy.”

Capitalism as a Disease

“We have constructed a system we cannot control. It imposes itself on us, and we become its slaves and victims.”

[...]

“There is an attractiveness around science and technology so they have abandoned their values that have been the foundation of their spiritual life in the past. [...] Because they follow western countries, they have already begun to suffer the same kind of suffering. The whole world crisis increases and globalisation is the seed of everything. They too have lost their non-dualistic view. There are Buddhists who think that Buddha is outside of them and available to them only after they die.

“In the past there were people who were not rich but contented with their living style, laughing and happy all day. But when the new rich people appear, people look at them and ask why don’t I have a life like that too, a beautiful house, car and garden and they abandon their values.”

The Catastrophe to Come

“Without collective awakening the catastrophe will come. [...] Civilisations have been destroyed many times and this civilisation is no different. It can be destroyed. We can think of time in terms of millions of years and life will resume little by little. The cosmos operates for us very urgently, but geological time is different.

“If you meditate on that, you will not go crazy. You accept that this civilisation could be abolished and life will begin later on after a few thousand years because that is something that has happened in the history of this planet. When you have peace in yourself and accept, then you are calm enough to do something, but if you are carried by despair there is no hope.

“It’s like the person who is struck with cancer or Aids and they learn they have been given one year or six months to live. They suffer very much and fight. But if they come to accept that they will die and they prepare to live every day peacefully and they enjoy every moment, the situation may change and the illness may go away. That has happened to many people.”

[...]

“That is why we believe that if there are communities of people like that in the world, we will demonstrate to the people and bring about an awakening so that people will abandon their course of comforts. If we can produce a collective awakening we can solve the problem of global warming. Together we have to provoke that type of awakening.”

One Buddha is Not Enough

“One Buddha is not enough, we need to have many Buddhas.”

(These quotes are excerpts from an article in The Guardian, and can be found here.)

Posted in Quotations, Thich Nhat Hahn | Leave a comment

The Gospel According to Thomas — Saying #2

Jesus said,

“Let the seeker not cease seeking until he finds. And when he finds, he will be troubled. And while troubled, he will be astonished! And in his astonishment, he will reign above all things. And reigning there, he shall rest.”

Similarly, the Buddha is said to have remarked, “There are two errors one can make along the road to Truth: not beginning the journey and, once begun, not completing it.” Clearly, if you don’t begin the journey you cannot complete it, but if you don’t muster the stamina to forge toward the goal — despite everything — the effort you’ve already made to achieve that goal will finally have been in vain.

“Let the seeker not cease seeking until he finds.”

The Second Saying in The Gospel According to Thomas seems to pick up on the idea earlier articulated by the Buddha, and then expands upon it: explaining the several phases the heroic seeker can expect along the way to recognizing the Truth.

“And when he finds, he will be troubled.”

It’s been said that, “The truth will set you free — but first it will piss you off.” The truth can be inconvenient, and this may explain the relative scarcity of Truth in a world so reliant upon the appearance of things. We like our truths both useful and convenient: “What possible ‘good’ is knowing that going to do for me?” As if the truth were obliged to do “you” some “good,” whatever that means. If doing you some “material good” is the only reason you’ve taken up the quest to discover Truth, then please just forget it — because then, you haven’t really taken it up after all. For, in that event, you would be better off to cut your losses, and walk away now — for you will more likely be laughed at and scorned outright for the radical truth-seeking that will be necessary, than you you can expect to be genuinely respected or materially rewarded.

But the derision — and outright “trouble” — sincere seekers will inevitably find along the way will not stop them, even if it pisses them off at first (and pretty much everyone else, too). On the contrary: this will only inspire sincere seekers to keep digging, to keep looking, and never ever to give up.

The good news of course is that “trouble” is not the final reward for sincere seekers — not, in fact, at all. After one has begun to find, “trouble” is only the beginning of a new and unfolding story.

“And while troubled, he will be astonished!”

The important thing to remember is that the sincere seeker — who keeps seeking, no matter the cost! — will be transformed by this process. Ultimately, it has never been that you can really expect “to change the world” by seeking Truth, but it is that you will be changed in the seeking. It has been said that the blessing is in the journey even more than it is in the arrival; this is not only true, but it is an insight that should be heeded, also.

Thomas Merton, the radical Roman Catholic monk from the 1960s brings some insight to bear on this general point. “We are not converted once,” he wrote, “but many times, and this endless series of large and small ‘conversions’ — inner revolutions — leads to our transformation in Christ. But while we may have the generosity to undergo one or two such upheavals, we cannot face the possibility of further and greater rendings of our inner self — without which we cannot finally become free.”

And this is the dilemma, the “trouble” the “living Jesus” is speaking of in Thomas. But for those with the stamina, the stick-to-it-iveness, the dogged determination to see this process through to the end, no matter what — in spite of all the “trouble” (the level or impact of which must not be underestimated) — they will arrive at The Mystery, which is the “astonishment” to which the living Jesus refers.

And what is this Mystery that is supposed to be so “astonishing”? Well, the Mystery is about “you” and your true identity — behind all appearances to the contrary. The discovery of this Mystery, if fully comprehended, will necessarily bring on “astonishment.” It is the penultimate step in the journey of return: a return to a realization of your first origins as Prime Mover, where you reign above all the merely simulated appearances of “things.”

And reigning there, you will find rest, for “the sign of the Father in you” is both a movement and a rest.

Posted in Gnosis, The Gospel According to Thomas | Tagged , | 4 Comments

The Gospel According to Thomas — Saying #1

These are the secret words spoken by the living Jesus, and transcribed by Didymus Judas Thomas. And Jesus said this:

“Whoever stumbles upon the meaning of these words shall not taste death.”

The Gospel According to Thomas begins with an explosive declaration: anyone (it doesn’t matter who) discovering the true meaning of this document’s forthcoming words — even if the meaning is “stumbled upon” by accident, one could presume — will “not taste death,” and possesses immortality.

Audacious words, to be sure.

Is it something about the document’s forthcoming words themselves, which have the power to impart eternal life? Or is the meaning perhaps deeper and more paradoxical?

A clue is offered by the words that introduce this first saying: “These are the secret words spoken by the living Jesus…” Why are the words “secret”? And who is “the living Jesus”?

The words are secret because their meaning remains hidden to all who haven’t first realized their true identity. Without first knowing (through Gnosis) who you are — who you really are, behind all appearances to the contrary — the deepest meaning of Thomas remains utterly opaque and incomprehensible. But to those who do know their true identity the meaning of these “secret words” has been revealed already, and death is already known to be impossible.

Appearances — and that is all this universe can offer — are deceiving.

So then, who are you — really?

Posted in Gnosis, The Gospel According to Thomas | Tagged , | 5 Comments

The Gospel According to Thomas

Of all the words I’ve read in my life, The Gospel According to Thomas holds one of the dearest places in my heart.

Before Gnosis became a recognized feature in my everyday experience of life, Thomas was largely incomprehensible to me and its meaning remained frustratingly opaque. Now, looking back, it was only after several years of living with the constant presence of Gnosis that Thomas really began to blossom for me into the meaningful series of insights it has become.

Several years ago, I undertook to study The Gospel According to Thomas in the deepest way I knew at the time: I worked to teach myself Coptic (the language Thomas was found written in when discovered at Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945), and I set forth to try and translate the document, word for word. I struggled mightily with this, until I realized that the mystery of Thomas is first revealed in an individual life when it lives with the unfolding presence of Gnosis, day to day — and, only then, do the pages of Thomas truly begin to reflect their deepest meaning. (I suppose that it could be possible for someone to become one of the world’s most talented Coptic scholars, produce the most accurate translation of The Gospel According to Thomas ever, and still manage to miss the real meaning behind these ancient words, which promise immortality. Something about seeing the trees and still managing to miss the forest comes to mind.)

Over the coming weeks, perhaps even longer, I want to take the version of the The Gospel According to Thomas that I produced in those days, and talk about its true meaning, which continues to unfold and blossom for me today.

The pages of Thomas are ever-illuminating-reflections really for lives touched by Gnosis. Because of this, the true meaning of Thomas’ “secret words” can be grasped only by those who themselves have been embraced by the light of Sophia — which is Gnosis.

Posted in Gnosis, The Gospel According to Thomas | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Permanence Within Impermanence?

From the earliest days of our lives, we are encouraged to build permanence for ourselves in this world.

But the nature of this world makes life here impermanent, even transient.

Little wonder that most of us find ourselves frustrated so often, is it?

Posted in Derangement, Gnosis, The Simulation Hypothesis | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“A Serious and Dangerous Hallucination”

“Inability to accept the mystic experience is more than an intellectual handicap, lack of awareness of the basic unity of organism and environment is a serious and dangerous hallucination.”

— Alan Watts, 20th Century writer and philosopher

Posted in Alan Watts, Quotations | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tired of Speaking Sweetly

Love wants to reach out and manhandle us,
Break all our teacup talk of God.

If you had the courage and
Could give the Beloved His choice, some nights,
He would just drag you around the room
By your hair,
Ripping from your grip all those toys in the world
That bring you no joy.

Love sometimes gets tired of speaking sweetly
And wants to rip to shreds
All your erroneous notions of truth

That make you fight within yourself, dear one,
And with others,

Causing the world to weep
On too many fine days.

God wants to manhandle us,
Lock us inside of a tiny room with Himself
And practice His dropkick.

The Beloved sometimes wants
To do us a great favor:

Hold us upside down
And shake all the nonsense out.

But when we hear
He is in such a “playful drunken mood”
Most everyone I know
Quickly packs their bags and hightails it
Out of town.

— Hafiz, 14th Century Sufi Poet

Posted in Hafiz, Quotations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

On the True Nature of Things — Part Three

Once I began to perceive “the true nature of things” — in the early stages of this understanding — I would spend quite a number of long and very difficult years lamenting the condition of the world I had now begun to perceive realistically. (This is the state of mind the Gospel of Thomas is referring to when it says, “Let the seeker not cease seeking until he finds — and when he finds, he will be troubled.”) When one begins to perceive reality in its unvarnished state, it’s troubling! I am convinced that much of the “depression” that is being treated today is often actually an outward sign that some people are waking up to reality, and perceiving it accurately for what it is — and that by treating this development as “a condition,” instead of as the incremental triumph that it is, we are turning seekers back towards denial instead of helping them face and then to transcend the stark facts of the universe we face.

It has become almost cliché in spiritual circles to speak of “a fallen world.” I myself denied this fact for many years in my rejection of organized religion, but I consider now that I was a bit too hasty. (Something about babies and bathwater comes to mind.) There is an enormous amount about organized religion that richly deserves to be “thrown out,” but in my zeal to reject the glaringly horrendous (and sometimes horrific) abuses of organized religion, I managed to dispense some of the wheat right along with the chaff.

Yes, this is “a fallen world” — this fact falls under the category of utterly obvious things, it now seems to me — but its “fallen-ness” is not our “fault,” as guilt-peddling prelates (wolves in sheep’s clothing, to be sure) have for generations exhorted us to believe (all the better to control you by). No. In fact this basic condition is not our fault at all! — even though we are part of this fallen-ness. That anyone would presume that this condition is our fault is utterly astonishing to me, but nonetheless many do. (I suppose these are some of the same sorts of individuals who are predisposed to feel G-U-I-L-T when the “lemon” they were sold at the auto dealership reveals itself as a piece of junk! It isn’t the customer’s fault that he was sold a piece-of-crap car; the fault lies in the materials and workmanship of the product itself — sometimes even the very nature of the product. Similarly, this fallen world is fallen by nature and, by nature, we are ancillary components of its fallen-ness — not the “responsible party” to whom blame deserves to be imputed. (But, as I say, my way of explaining things doesn’t serve to guilt individuals into handing over their personal sovereignty — and tidy portions of their money — to manipulative religion.)

Ours is an inferior, fallen universe where predation, decay, and suffering are threads woven into the very fabric of existence here. Again, this is not “our fault,” it is a fact of life that has pre-existed human beings long before humans might ever have lived in a primordial “garden” and well before any one of us might have even considered partaking of any allegedly “forbidden fruit.”

Any creator that beheld “all that he had made,” and could still manage to conclude that it was “very good” is a creator with notably inferior standards. Fortuntately, this was only a myth — and an extremely contrived myth at that.

The truth of the matter of course is far different.

This is a fallen world because it was created as a fallen world (and this is where I part company a bit with the opinions of several of my Gnostic friends); it was created as a fallen world not out of spite or evil intent, but for a far deeper reason: when someone wants to experience all possibilities, “a fallen world” is one of those possibilities. Our universe (and countless others like it) were evolved for the purpose of divine experience — in all of its possible forms.

This universe is one possible form divine experience might take, and indeed has taken.

So, understood in this way, our universe is not the product of an “evil creator god,” but one natural development of reality in all of its possible multitudinous forms.

Since suffering is a consequence of the divine Question that inspired this universe into (simulated) existence, above all things we should have mercy on ourselves and each other — for the Essence of what We truly are, collectively, has been placed inside a deranged and fallen world, and We now do our best to cope with the consequences of this situation. Other worlds might perhaps be expected to be different or better, but this world — given its flawed and fallen nature — should be expected to be just as it is, and can be expected to be no more than that.

Surprisingly, there is often much good to be found here — in spite of everything. The region of Mind-space we inhabit (this fallen universe) is not a punishment nor is it a consequence of personal karma, it is simply a fact of life and, to the degree that something like “karma” might be said to be involved at all, it would be the karma of God, for We are all aspects of God.

We do find ourselves limited (and to some extent predetermined) by our historical context and our genetic history, however. Our biology predisposes us to certain behaviors far more than we may realize. There is a degree of freedom available to us, but while we are enfleshed here we are not “radically free” as many religions have proposed. Because of this, we must do our best to cope with our limited condition, and we must also never condemn ourselves for our inability to do so.

Parmenides was correct: Truth cannot be known through sensory perception. This is because nothing is as it appears in this “matrix” — only Gnosis which originates from outside the confines of this universe can illuminate the Truth. All appearances here are therefore deceptive. The greatest shamanic and mystical insights from our deep past have suggested and Twentieth Century physics has confirmed (and proved) that reality is vastly different from its appearances, and science is still working to integrate this insight.

For as Albert Einstein once famously remarked, “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.”

Posted in First Steps | Leave a comment

On the True Nature of Things — Part Two

The beginning of the end of delusion lies in remembrance.

When I began to remember, it felt like my life was coming unraveled. Of course what had begun to unravel was my certainty in the collective delusion — but since my life, like everyone’s life, had been built around this collective delusion, it felt like my life itself was coming apart at the seams. (Had I not become so attached to the delusion, surely this process would have been easier. This is why so many of the brightest human lights have said, “Take nothing with you.”)

When I say that I began to remember, I’m referring to the onset of Gnosis. Some of the ancient Greeks thought of this process as “anamnesis,” literally “the loss of forgetfulness.” Philip K. Dick speaks of Gnosis in terms of “disinhibiting instructions” — and his is perhaps the best definition I’ve ever heard. Through Gnosis — through the action of a kind of “living information” beginning to rewrite the delusional errors we have been immersed in since infancy — we begin “anamnesis”: we begin to remember.

In remembrance, we begin to understand that we are not just the people we thought we were: we’re Something far more, Something not merely human — and it begins to dawn on us that our true origins are not “here.”  The fact that this sounds vaguely unhinged punctuates the level of delusion we have been plunged into since infancy, and have therefore always accepted as real.

There are probably as many ways to experience Gnosis as there are ways to experience anything else in the wide-ranging spectrum of human possibilities. There is no one “right” way to experience Gnosis and your experience of this will doubtless be different from mine.

That said, I’d like to share with you what I experience — and right off the bat we’re in unexpected territory. “Gnosis” is a Greek word that means “knowledge,” and most people expect Gnosis to be a simply cerebral experience, a matter having to do with the intellect only. Or a religious experience, something necessarily connected with organized religion. None of this has been my experience at all. In fact, the experience was so overwhelming — in its initial stages especially — that Gnosis actually blinded my intellect, much as an overwhelmingly bright light might temporarily blind someone’s ability to see, and it devastated all of my religious expectations.

And, although I may use religious-sounding metaphors to describe Gnosis (language is a limited faculty), please know that religion is not an essential element of Gnosis — at all.

In my first encounter with Gnosis, I was thunderstruck and struck dumb, as it were, much like Zechariah, the father of St. John the Baptist, in the biblical tale. Now, when I say “struck dumb,” I’m not intending to declare that I lost the ability to speak; no, what I’m trying to communicate is that I suddenly realized that my efforts to articulate what I wanted to say about this were wholly inadequate to the task.

After all, how do you say in words what words can’t say? Such was the early beginning of my experience of Gnosis which, as I’ve found, is far more a dynamic process than any kind of static state.

So blinding was this invisible light from within that I knew — with every cell in my body — that all the millions of words written over all the centuries attempting to encapsulate Truth were mere signposts (and some of them were actually aiming in the right general direction, while others of course were not), but none had even the faintest hope of hitting the mark directly. A student of Christian theology at the time, this knowledge rocked my world.

And then there was for me the physical dimension of Gnosis.

Like the rest of the experience of Gnosis, the physical dimension of it came upon me suddenly and very unexpectedly when I was 18. I was away at college at the time, I was meditating, and — suddenly and unexpectedly — I was feeling something in my hands that is normally reserved only for the domain of sight: I was feeling a sensation of light. My eyes themselves saw nothing, but if the visual perception of light were to be translated into the realm of touch, that sensation would come as close as I can describe to what I experienced.

The sensation was powerful, unmistakably real, and — emphatically — nothing that I could ignore.

At first, I worried secretly that I was losing my grip, that I had suddenly gone a bit bonkers. So I eventually found my courage, and confided the experience to one of my professors, a psychologist who was also a Roman Catholic priest (remember, I was a theology major at the time), and I asked him directly if he thought this sounded at all like schizophrenia. His answer was no (fortunately!), since I exhibited no other indication of the condition. But he also said he really didn’t know what it might be; he said that if he still believed in genuine mystical experience, that this is what he would call what he’d heard me describing to him.

Then he advised me to keep quiet about it. And so I did, for the greater part — and for many years.

Many years later now, the feeling has neither vanished nor has it subsided; in fact, it has only increased. Eventually I would come to feel this Luminous Intelligence not only in my hands but emerging from within and encompassing my entire body. It seemed to have a sense of presence attached to it, and a conscious Intelligence, as I’ve just alluded to.

In the years since, this creative Intelligence has totally revolutionized my life — from top to bottom.

I must say that I would not trade this gift for anything in the world — absolutely nothing — but I must also say that the inner revolutions that have resulted from courting this Creative Intelligence have not been without considerable earthly costs, either. (When I eventually came across The Gospel According to Thomas, I resonated with it — especially some of the words in its beginning: “Let the seeker not stop seeking until he finds. And when he finds, he will be troubled.” In my case, I would be troubled — and for quite some time to come.)

Although I went on to earn my theology degrees, I am no longer outwardly religious. To me, Gnosis is much deeper and more profound than any religious truth — even words themselves fail in the face of it.

Posted in Gnosis, On the True Nature of Things | Tagged , | Leave a comment